HOW TO DISSOLVE A PARTNERSHIP FIRM– Adv.Suyog Chandulal Shah
Dissolving a
partnership firm means discontinuing the business under the name of said
partnership firm. In this case, all liabilities are finally settled by selling
off assets or transferring them to a particular partner, settling all accounts
existed with the partnership firm.
Any profit/ loss is
transferred to partners in their profit sharing ratio as agreed by them in the
partnership deed.
Dissolving a
partnership firm is different from dissolving a partnership. In the former
case, the firm ends its name and hence cannot do business in the future. But in
case of dissolving a partnership, the existing partnership is dissolved– by
consent or on happening of a certain event, but the firm can retain its
existence if remaining partners enter into a new partnership agreement. There
are different ways in which a partnership firm may get dissolved-
When partners are mutually agreed
It is the easiest
way to dissolve a partnership firm since all partners have mutually agreed upon
closing the partnership firm. Partners can give a mutual consent or may enter
into an agreement for the dissolve.
Compulsory dissolution
A firm may need to
be dissolved compulsorily if:
- All
partners or all partners except one partner are declared insolvent
- The
firm is carrying unlawful activities like dealing in drugs or other illegal
products or doing business with alien countries or other countries that
may harm the interest of India or doing other such activities.
Dissolution depending on certain contingent events
Upon happening of
certain events, a firm may be required to get dissolved:
- Expiry
of fixed-term– Partnership formed for a fixed term will get dissolved once
the term gets over.
- Completion
of task– Sometimes, a partnership is formed for a certain task or
objective. Once the task is completed, the partnership will automatically
get dissolved.
- Death
of the partner– If there are only two partners, and one of the partner
dies, the partnership firm will automatically dissolve. If there are more
than two partners, other partners may continue to run the firm. In such
case, only the partnership will get dissolved, and other partners will
enter into a new agreement.
Dissolution by notice
If a partnership
business is at will, any partner can dissolve the partnership by giving an
advanced notice. Notice will contain a date from which dissolution will be
effective.
Dissolution by Court
If any of the
partners becomes mentally unstable or misbehaves with the other partner(s) or
doesn’t abide by the clauses of the agreement, the other partner(s) may file a
case in the court to dissolve the firm. But a court can dissolve the firm only
if it is registered with the registrar of firms. Hence an unregistered
partnership firm can’t be dissolved by the court.
Transfer of interest or equity to the third party
If any partner
transfers control in the form of interest or equity to a third party without
consulting other partners, the partner(s) may dissolve the firm.
Partners still liable to third parties
Until a public
notice of dissolution is given, partners remain liable for any act done by any
of the partners which would have been an act of the firm, if such act was done
before resolution.
If a partner has
been declared insolvent or has retired from the firm, he will not liable for
any acts done after his insolvency or retirement. The legal heirs of any
deceased partner are also not liable for any acts done by other partners after
the partner has died.
How are accounts settled
Accounts of the
firm are settled in the following order–
- Losses
of the firm will be paid out of the profits, next out of the capital of
the partners, and even then, losses aren’t paid off, losses will be
divided among the partners in profit sharing ratios,
- Assets
of the firm and the capital contributed by the partners to set-off losses
of the firm will be applied in the following order–
- Third party debts will be paid first
- Next, loan amount taken by firm from any
partner will be repaid to that partner
- Capital contributed by each partner will be
repaid to him in the capital contribution ratio
- Balance amount will be shared among the
partners in their profit sharing ratios.
- this article deals with how a partnership firm
can be dissolved according to partnership act, 1932 and what are its
consequences...
- Dissolution of
Firms
When the relation between all the
partners of the firm comes to an end, this is called dissolution of the firm.
Section 39 of the Indian Partnership Act, provides that “the dissolution of the
partnership between all the partners of a firm is called the dissolution of a
firm.” It implies the complete break down of the relation of partnership
between all the partners.
Dissolution of partnership is different from the dissolution of
firm.
Dissolution of a partnership firm merely involves a change in the relation of partners; whereas the dissolution of firm amounts to a complete closure of the business. When any of the partners dies, retires or become insolvent but if the remaining partners still agree to continue the business of the partnership firm, then it is dissolution of partnership not the dissolution of firm. Dissolution of partnership changes the mutual relations of the partners. But in case of dissolution of firm, all the relations and the business of the firm comes to an end. On dissolution of the firm, the business of the firm ceases to exist since its affairs are would up by selling the assets and by paying the liabilities and discharging the claims of the partners. The dissolution of partnership among all partners of a firm is called dissolution of the firm.
Dissolution of a Partnership firm may be effected in the following ways:
·Dissolution without the intervention of the Court.
·Dissolution by Court.
Dissolution of a partnership firm merely involves a change in the relation of partners; whereas the dissolution of firm amounts to a complete closure of the business. When any of the partners dies, retires or become insolvent but if the remaining partners still agree to continue the business of the partnership firm, then it is dissolution of partnership not the dissolution of firm. Dissolution of partnership changes the mutual relations of the partners. But in case of dissolution of firm, all the relations and the business of the firm comes to an end. On dissolution of the firm, the business of the firm ceases to exist since its affairs are would up by selling the assets and by paying the liabilities and discharging the claims of the partners. The dissolution of partnership among all partners of a firm is called dissolution of the firm.
Dissolution of a Partnership firm may be effected in the following ways:
·Dissolution without the intervention of the Court.
·Dissolution by Court.
Dissolution without the intervention of Court:-
1. By Agreement (S.40)
A partnership firm can be dissolved
any time with the consent of all the partners whether the partnership is at
will or for a fixed duration. A partnership can be dissolved in accordance with
the terms of the Partnership Deed or of the separate agreement.
2. Compulsory Dissolution (Sec.41):-
In case, any of the following events take place then it becomes compulsory for
the firm to dissolute:
(i) Insolvency of Partners
(i) Insolvency of Partners
In case all the partners or all the
partners except one become insolvent.
(ii) Unlawful Business
(ii) Unlawful Business
In case the firm is engaged in more
than one business which may have become unlawful, the better view appears to be
that the firm will not dissolve as to the other legitimate businesses unless
all of them are so inter connected that stoppage of one would paralyze the
others e.g. A and B charter a ship to go to foreign port and receive a cargo on
the joint venture. War breaks out between England and the country where the
port is situated before the ship arrives at the port, and continues until after
the time appointed for loading. The partnership between A and B is dissolved
3. Dissolution on the happening of contingent event (S.42) A firm may be dissolved on the happening of any of the following contingent event
(i) Expiry of Fixed Period
A firm constituted for a term is of
course not exempt from dissolution by any of the other possible cause before
the expiration of the term. The contract may expressly provide that the
partnership will determine in certain circumstances but even if there is no
such express term, an implied term as to when the partnership will determine
may be gathered from the contract and the nature of the business. The provision
of this section make it clear that unless some contract between the partners to
the contrary is proved, the firm, if constituted for a fixed term would be
dissolved by the expiry of that term.
(ii) On achievement of specific task
A partnership constituted to carry out contracts with specified persons during a particular season would be taken to be dissolved once the contracts are closed. In the case of Basantlal Jalan v. Chiranjilal, Where the firm was constituted for a specific undertaking to supply certain quantity of grain and the contract was prematurely terminated after supply of a part of the goods, it was held that the partnership did not come to an end and was dissolved only on the final realization of the assets
(ii) On achievement of specific task
A partnership constituted to carry out contracts with specified persons during a particular season would be taken to be dissolved once the contracts are closed. In the case of Basantlal Jalan v. Chiranjilal, Where the firm was constituted for a specific undertaking to supply certain quantity of grain and the contract was prematurely terminated after supply of a part of the goods, it was held that the partnership did not come to an end and was dissolved only on the final realization of the assets
(iii) Death of Partner
When the deed of partnership did not
provide that the death of a partner would not dissolve the partnership, the
partnership stood dissolve on the death of a partner. Firm, stands dissolved
automatically on death of one partner. Continuance of business after such death
would not tantamount to continuance of earlier partnership.
(iv) Insolvency of Partner
(iv) Insolvency of Partner
In the absence of a contract to the
contrary, the insolvency of any of the partner may dissolve the firm.the rule
shall apply even though the partnership has been constituted for a fixed term
and the term has not yet expired or has been constituted for particular
ventureand the same has yet not been completed.
(v) Resignation of Partner
Resignation by any of the partners
dissolves the partnership
4. Dissolution by notice (S.43)
In case of partnership at will, a
partner can dissolve it by giving written notice of dissolution to other
partners duly signed by him. Notice must be very clear and certain. A notice
once given cannot be withdrawn without the consent of other partners was held
in case of Banarsidas v. Kanshi Ram. In those cases where a partner has given notice
of dissolution at a time when dissolution will give him some advantage over the
other partners, he may be held in the firm till the pending transactions are
completed.
Dissolution by Court (S 44)
The court may order for the
dissolution of the firm on the following grounds:-
(i) Insanity of Partner
On the application of any of the
partner, court may order for the dissolution of the firm if a partner has
become of an unsound mind. Lunacy of a partner does not itself dissolve the
partnership but it will be a ground for dissolution at the instance of other
partners. It is not necessary that the lunacy should be permanent. In the case
of a dormant partner the court may not order dissolution even on the ground of
permanent insanity, except in special circumstances.
(ii) Incapacity of Partner
(ii) Incapacity of Partner
If a partner has become permanent in
capable of discharging his duties and obligations then court may order for the
dissolution of firm on the application of any of the partner. where a partner
is imprisoned for a long period of time the court may dissolve the partnership
was held in case of Whitwell v. Arthur
(iii) Misconduct of Partner
If any partner other than partner
suing is responsible for any loss to the firm, which amounts to misconduct and
prejudicially affects the carrying on of business then the court may order for
the dissolution of the firm.
(iv) Constant breach of agreement by partner
The court may order for the
dissolution of the firm if the partner other than the suing partner is found
guilty for constant breach of agreement regarding the conduct of business or
the management of the affairs of the firm and it becomes impossible to continue
the business with such partner.
(v) Transfer of Interest
(v) Transfer of Interest
When any of the partner other than
the suing partner transfers whole of its share to the third party for
permanently.
(vi) Continuous Losses
The court may order for dissolution
if the firm is continuously suffering losses and there is no more capital
available for the future growth of the firm.
(vii) Just and Equitable
(vii) Just and Equitable
The court may order for dissolution
on any other ground which court think is just, fair and equitable. e.g. loss of
total confidence between the partners was held in case of Havidatt singh v.
Mukhe Singh
Liability for acts of partners done after dissolution ( S.45)
This section provides that despite dissolution, the partners cannot escape their liability to third parties for acts done even thereafter unless public notice of dissolution is given. These provision emphasis the necessity of giving a public notice before a partner could terminated his future liability whether it is a case of dissolution, retirement or expulsion.
Rights of partners to have business wound up after dissolution (S.46)
On the dissolution of a firm every partner or his representative is entitled, as against all the other partners or their representatives, to have the property of the firm applied in payment of the debts and liabilities of the firm, and to have the surplus distributed among the partners or their representatives according to their rights.
Continuing authority of partners for purposes of winding up ( S.47)
After the dissolution of a firm the authority of each partner to bind the firm, and the other mutual rights and obligations of the partners continue notwithstanding the dissolution, so far as may be necessary to wind up the affair of the firm and to complete transactions begun but unfinished at the time of the dissolution, but not otherwise:
PROVIDED that the firm is in no case bound by the acts of a partner who has been adjudicated insolvent; but this proviso does not affect the liability of any person who has after the adjudication represented himself or knowingly permitted himself to be represented as a partner of the insolvent.
Liability for acts of partners done after dissolution ( S.45)
This section provides that despite dissolution, the partners cannot escape their liability to third parties for acts done even thereafter unless public notice of dissolution is given. These provision emphasis the necessity of giving a public notice before a partner could terminated his future liability whether it is a case of dissolution, retirement or expulsion.
Rights of partners to have business wound up after dissolution (S.46)
On the dissolution of a firm every partner or his representative is entitled, as against all the other partners or their representatives, to have the property of the firm applied in payment of the debts and liabilities of the firm, and to have the surplus distributed among the partners or their representatives according to their rights.
Continuing authority of partners for purposes of winding up ( S.47)
After the dissolution of a firm the authority of each partner to bind the firm, and the other mutual rights and obligations of the partners continue notwithstanding the dissolution, so far as may be necessary to wind up the affair of the firm and to complete transactions begun but unfinished at the time of the dissolution, but not otherwise:
PROVIDED that the firm is in no case bound by the acts of a partner who has been adjudicated insolvent; but this proviso does not affect the liability of any person who has after the adjudication represented himself or knowingly permitted himself to be represented as a partner of the insolvent.
Mode of settlement of accounts between partners (S.48)In settling the accounts of a firm after dissolution, the following rules shall, subject to agreement by the partners, be observed-
(a) Deficiencies of capital
When a
partnership is dissolved, and after the debts to the third parties have been
paid and advances made by a partner have been repaid, the assets are
insufficient to repay each partner his capital in full, any deficiencies must
be borne by the partners in the same proportion as the profits would have been
divided
(b) The
assets of a firm are to be applied in paying
1.joint debts to third parties
2.advances, as distinguished from capital, of each partner
3. to each partner what is due from the firm to him in respect of capital.
1.joint debts to third parties
2.advances, as distinguished from capital, of each partner
3. to each partner what is due from the firm to him in respect of capital.
In after
the above payments are made, there is surplus, that surplus is to be divided in
the proportion.
Personal
profits earned after dissolution (S.50)
Where a partner, after dissolution and before the affairs of the partnership are wound up, derives any personal profit for himself from any transactions of the firm, or from the use of the property or business connection of the firm or the firm name, he shall account for the profit and pay his share to the surviving partner or the representative of the deceased partner. But if a partner carries on another business of a similar nature, this section would not apply.
Where a partner, after dissolution and before the affairs of the partnership are wound up, derives any personal profit for himself from any transactions of the firm, or from the use of the property or business connection of the firm or the firm name, he shall account for the profit and pay his share to the surviving partner or the representative of the deceased partner. But if a partner carries on another business of a similar nature, this section would not apply.
Sale of goodwill after dissolution (S.55)
(1) In
settling the accounts of a firm after dissolution, the goodwill shall, subject
to contract between the partners, be included in the assets, and it may be sold
either separately or along with other property of the firm.
(2)
Rights of buyer and seller of goodwill-Where the goodwill of a firm is sold
after dissolution, a partner may carry on a business competing with that of the
buyer and he may advertise such business, but, subject to agreement between him
and the buyer, he may not-
(a) use
the firm name,
(b)
represent himself as carrying on the business of the firm, or
(c) solicit the custom of persons who were dealing with the firm before its dissolution.
(c) solicit the custom of persons who were dealing with the firm before its dissolution.
(3)
Agreement in restraint of trade—Any partner may, upon the sale of the goodwill
of a firm, make an agreement with the buyer that such partner will not carry on
any business similar to that of the firm within a specified period or within
specified local limits and, notwithstanding anything contained in section 27 of
the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), such agreement shall be valid if the
restrictions imposed are reasonable.
Documents Required for dissolution of partnership firm :-
A partnership
firm may be discontinued or dissolved in any of the following
ways.
· Dissolution by Agreement. The
easiest and the most hassle-
free
method to dissolve a partnership firm is by mutual consent or an agreement. ...
method to dissolve a partnership firm is by mutual consent or an agreement. ...
·
Dissolution by Notice. ...
·
Dissolution due to
contingencies. ...
·
Compulsory Dissolution. ...
·
Dissolution by Court.
Adv.Suyog Chandulal Shah
Adv.Suyog Shah & Associates,
Email :- advsuyogshah@gmail.com,
Mobile No.9850827178
Office No.0253-2313178
Comments
Post a Comment